닫기

Faculty

home    Faculty    Faculty Publications

Faculty Publications

Visual memory tests enhance the identification of amnestic MCI cases at greater risk of Alzheimer’s disease
Year of publication 2018
Title of paper Visual memory tests enhance the identification of amnestic MCI cases at greater risk of Alzheimer’s disease
Author Javier Oltra-Cucarella , Miriam Sánchez-SanSegundo, Darren M. Lipnicki, John D. Crawford, Richard B. Lipton, Mindy J. Katz, Andrea R. Zammit, Nikolaos Scarmeas , Efthimios Dardiotis, Mary H. Kosmidis, Antonio Guaita, Roberta Vaccaro, Ki Woong Kim, Ji Won Han, Nicole A. Kochan, Henry Brodaty , José A. Pérez-Vicente, Luis Cabello-Rodríguez, Perminder S. Sachdev , Rosario Ferrer-Cascales and Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC)
Publication in journal International Psychogeriatrics
Status of publication accepted
Vol 31(7)
Link https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics… 216회 연결
Objectives:

To investigate whether amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) identified with visual memory tests conveys an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease (risk-AD) and if the risk-AD differs from that associated with aMCI based on verbal memory tests.

 

Participants:

4,771 participants aged 70.76 (SD = 6.74, 45.4% females) from five community-based studies, each a member of the international COSMIC consortium and from a different country, were classified as having normal cognition (NC) or one of visual, verbal, or combined (visual and verbal) aMCI using international criteria and followed for an average of 2.48 years. Hazard ratios (HR) and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis analyzed the risk-AD with age, sex, education, single/multiple domain aMCI, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores as covariates.

 

Results:

All aMCI groups (n = 760) had a greater risk-AD than NC (n = 4,011; HR range = 3.66 – 9.25). The risk-AD was not different between visual (n = 208, 17 converters) and verbal aMCI (n = 449, 29 converters, HR = 1.70, 95%CI: 0.88, 3.27, p = 0.111). Combined aMCI (n = 103, 12 converters, HR = 2.34, 95%CI: 1.13, 4.84, p = 0.023) had a higher risk-AD than verbal aMCI. Age and MMSE scores were related to the risk-AD. The IPD meta-analyses replicated these results, though with slightly lower HR estimates (HR range = 3.68, 7.43) for aMCI vs. NC.

 

Conclusions:

Although verbal aMCI was most common, a significant proportion of participants had visual-only or combined visual and verbal aMCI. Compared with verbal aMCI, the risk-AD was the same for visual aMCI and higher for combined aMCI. Our results highlight the importance of including both verbal and visual memory tests in neuropsychological assessments to more reliably identify aMCI.